OK, I finally saw the butter sculpture today. Before I go further, I want to go on record that I have tested my interpretation of the sculpture in front of audiences looking at the sculpture and besides laughing, they all agreed.

Let us be perfectly clear: The media has been lying through their teeth about the sculpture. It is no more about a mother and her children, than I am a mother. The sculpture is a pedophile’s wet dream.

The sculpture shows an anatomically detailed depiction of a teen / early 20’s female who has a very tight and lean hard body. She is dressed in spandex shorts and a sports bra. The artist paid very careful detail and attention to make sure both the woman’s genitals were prominent and that the underwear crease in her butt is showing through the shorts.

The woman is standing, showing off her hard tight body while sucking a small bottle of milk. Next to her is a boy, obviously a few years younger, with one foot resting on a ball and the rest of him leaning forward on a bench upon which he is seated and holding a small bottle of chocolate milk. The interpretation here was obvious. The boy had an erection from staring at the hot chick’s girlie parts and thus HAD to stay sitting. He was drinking the chocolate milk the woman gave him because, well, the woman likes her men dark.

Off to the side of the boy stands a cute adorable approximately 10 year old girl. I have no idea why she is in the scene as she is not in athletic gear. The woman is offering the little girl a bottle of strawberry milk.

This is where things got confusing for me. In keeping with the interpretation, the only reason I could come up with was that the strawberry milk was tendered as a symbol of the little girl’s innocence and virginity. If she sticks with milk, that little girl may one day grow up to be a tight hard slut like the role model.