With all due respect Mrs. Todeschini, I must disagree

By Mark David Blum, Esq.

Your Op/Ed this morning really brought about a strong reaction in me.

The tears are not yet dried on our faces and the earth has not yet settled on the fresh grave, but that did not stop the New York Senate from rushing into the tempest. Standing upon the back of a pregnant police widow and instead of behaving with the quiet reflection of Lawmakers, the State Senate has thrust itself in front of a grieving pregnant widow to grab the spotlight and position lawmakers as saviors of police – in an election year. Now, only the Assembly stands between a civilized society and making New York a far more dangerous place to live.

Mrs. Todeschini: To this point in time, for professional reasons, I have remained relatively mute on the recent death of your husband. He was a good man who did an honorable job. His death was untimely, tragic, and probably avoidable. The more than one thousand five hundred mourners at his funeral was a broad understatement of just how deep and sad is our community at his death. I have done ‘business’ with Craig in the past and have never known or harbored a negative opinion of him. As his wife, your children and family are owed a great deal by our community. We will never forget them or him.

My knowledge of the specific facts of this case is limited to what I read in the news and a few tidbits here and there of inside information. The Trooper died from injuries suffered in a collision with a tree when he failed to negotiate a curve in the road. Despite modifications, the SUVs used by the State Police are not built for high speed pursuits. Apparently Craig lost control at a speed of less than 50 miles per hour and was killed upon impact.

It was a pointless death. He had spotted a motorcycle traveling at what he reported as traveling in excess of 100 miles per hour and turned around to give chase. Because Craig was killed as he was beginning that chase, our local District Attorney seeks to prosecute the motorcyclist for manslaughter. To him and to a large segment of our society, “blame” and “punishment” are required. Someone has to pay and suffer for the Trooper’s death. Mr. Fitzpatrick is going to do his best to make sure the speeder does some serious long and hard time. The law being used by the D.A. is a law like the pending before the Assembly.

This is the crux of the argument made by Mrs. Todeschini in her article in the Syracuse Newspapers. She does have history on her side. Likewise, it will be too late to undo the splash back and harm to the innocent should this proposed Bill become Law.

In the flurry of ‘get tough’ and ‘protect our police’ laws passed by Republicans in the moments and hours after 9/11, a new law was added that made it a serious felony to engage in an act that results in the injury or death of a police officer. Our lawmakers capitalizing on the sentiment of so many rescuers dead in the Twin Towers, used the passions of the moment to raise up our police officers to a higher social status, such that if you dare and harm one hair on their bodies, you will go down for a very long time. We already had an felony assault charge on the books for that purpose. Still, that was not good enough and pandering politicians needed to look tough on crime.

New York’s Court of Appeals has sided with prosecutors on this question. There was a case where a police officer was in foot pursuit of a fleeing suspect. The suspect jumped a wall and ran across a busy highway. Following the suspect, the police officer went over the wall, but fell upon landing. He was hit by a passing car and killed. The conviction for manslaughter was upheld on appeal.

Consequently, my legal position on this question is irrelevant. Persons smarter and more-well read than am I, are seemingly content with a world such as this. What more can I add other than to say that I do not believe there is any social benefit gained beyond misguided application of raw vengeance and the destruction of more lives.

This is what awaits Mr. Carncross, the motorcyclist who apparently was the target of the Trooper’s chase. He now, like every one of us in society, is liable for the interceding and perhaps errors in judgment or action of others. Imagine if instead, Mr. Carncross was in an old clunker with a smoking muffler and blaring music going 15 miles an hour over the posted speed limit. Imagine too that everything else that happened thereafter, did so: Namely, the trooper turns around to give chase and pull over the driver for minor vehicle and traffic violations … and again, fails to negotiate that turn and is killed. What if the trooper sneezed and crossed the line and was killed? It is now going to be part of the defense to ask the jury to determine whether the chasing (and now deceased) officer did everything technically proper for operating the motor vehicle? I am firmly of the opinion that our hatred for Mr. Carncross is in great part, predicated upon the revulsion and snobbish dislike of people who ride motorcycles.

Likewise playing a part is the fact that instead of 15 miles per hour over the speed limit, Carncross was more likely going 50 miles over. Then, we add in his age and lack of financial wherewithal, his apparent criminal history, and his failure to surrender himself … together with the public outrage at that website. Combined, all those factors made for a cocktail that has candidates drunk with excitement to grab one for their campaign. What they are proposing is that it will now be a felony subject to a maximum of 15 years in prison for ANYONE to flee a police officer; no matter what.

This proposed Law hastily crafted and proposed by the Assembly is going to be a major disaster for citizens of the State. It will keep me busy and contribute toward a college education for my kids. But this law, will crush the lives of so many innocents, and give so much power to police, such that none of us is safe.

No, this is not about … ‘taking the ticket’. Any fool who runs from police merely to avoid a speeding ticket or other traffic matter is an idiot. Yes, that should be a separate criminal matter. But just fleeing, without more, should not result in building more prisons. If the fleeing person is just “fleeing”; in other words, not stopping, there is a misdemeanor charge available. It is called “resisting arrest”. If the fleeing suspect enhances his criminal behavior by reckless driving, or causing major damage or injury to others in the process, there are serious charges available to add onto the initial vehicle and traffic violation. Merely “fleeing” without more, should not cause a citizen to lose his liberty for more than a decade.

More importantly, however, is the situation right now today on the streets here in Syracuse. Let us assume for a moment that the Assembly’s Pander-Bill becomes Law. On any given night on the South Side of Syracuse, police employ a tactic that I like to call a “gang rush”. When not otherwise occupied, police will spot a group of young people standing around. Police will then gather about a block away; perhaps as many as five or more officers are involved. Suddenly, the police will break into a run and charge toward the group standing on the sidewalk. Whoever runs from that charge is going to be targeted for a stop for “resisting arrest” and then searched and run through the system. I have spoken to many kids in local schools who tell me that they run from the cops just because a gang of cops is suddenly charging toward them and the kids are scared shitless.

Applying the Pander-Law, these once innocent kids and young adults are going to spend their college years at Attica University. Say goodbye to another generation of young Black males in Syracuse.

In part, Craig died and we are all crying today still, because of the social trauma we suffered back in September of 2001. In our national anger, capitalized upon and manipulated by ‘some’ folks in government and politics, we all became captives to our own ache for vengeance. We now live in a world where we have to “get” every offender. Nobody is allowed to escape. Even the smallest of offenses buried in the closet from decades ago, are coming back to haunt people thanks to algorithms put in place by Homeland Security. Do some research on the The National Driver Register and you will see what I mean.

Perhaps if we dialed back our efforts at enforcement of the smallest violations of the law we could return to a kinder more gentler society. So, Carncross was going 100 mph. Let him go, get out on the radio and slowly search for him … if it is that damn important. How many blue bikes were there and how hard was he to find? Did Craig have to die for the energy to be expended?

I just finished a trial in Federal Court where according to the testimony, a young man was skateboarding in the Armory back in 2000 as he had done all his life. Unknown to him, the Common Council had then recently enacted a law which banned skateboarding in the Armory. One evening, while doing his thing, the skateboarder passed two bicycle cops talking on the sidewalk. The skateboarder was in the street when he passed. According to police, they yelled to him to stop. The rider denied hearing anything and kept going.

It is what happened next that makes the point. When it was over, the kid was in handcuffs and in custody and spent the night in jail. His shoulder was badly injured and he had several bruises on his body. His charge? “Resisting Arrest”. Also, he was charged with violating the skateboard ordinance. Taking both sides as having testified truthfully, it is apparent that the police thought the rider heard them, got angry and felt “disrespected” when the rider did not stop, and approached the rider with hostility and suspicion. The rider saw himself suddenly approached by police who were being hostile, belligerent, and using their hands for no damn good reason. Guess who won that dispute?

A big part of my perception of what brought on Trooper Todeschini’s death was the need to capture and get the sonovabitch who just blew by him. It was just a speeding violation or at worst, reckless driving. Craig did not need to blow his engine and drive himself into a tree for something so fucking petty. Mr. Carncross should not be imprisoned for the next two decades because he was engaged in age appropriate misbehavior.

Just as a side note: I have been so utterly fascinated in the wider discussion of the so-called (and utterly offensive term) “crotch-rockets” and how so many local riders were avoiding and lying to police. It seemed almost laughable that of so many local riders, many more than just one of them suspected that it might have been them involved in the Trooper’s chase. Have we suddenly experienced an epidemic of rocketing motorcycles?

I would also add as a side note that if I had a motorcycle or small penis muscle car, and I was on a wide open highway that was dry, clear, and without impediment, I might too be tempted to open it up and see what the honey can do. A sad but true fact of motor heads is that speed is part of the thrill. Doing it on a busy highway or on public streets is pure stupid. But the happenstance of coming upon a trooper in the middle of nowhere on a Sunday afternoon is rare and the risk is low and yes, we all take liberties at times. The question becomes one of reasonableness.

More offensive than all of this is how the Assembly rushed to the fore with a quickly drawn Bill. Instead being leaders guideing us through our sadness and pain, our elected officials have made themselves nothing more than a conduit through which they can manipulate our anger and grief for their own personal political gain.

With all due respect, I must disagree with Mrs. Todeschini. Your husband did not die defending us from speeders on motorcycles. He defended the constitution and protected our freedom. This law being passed in his name seems contrary to his primary mission. I can assure you also that it will not ease your pain; it will only create more for other people. When my predictions come true, I will be back and remind you of this discussion.